Tuesday, September 25, 2018

Propositions on the November 6 Ballot and What They Mean to You



Proposition A – ReBuild Houston - Oppose


Background
In 2010, the City of Houston proposed a charter amendment that would create a “lockbox” fund which would hold and protect monies earmarked for infrastructure and drainage projects.  Shortly after the very narrow passage of the “lock box” charter amendment (51%), city leaders imposed a drainage fee on every piece of real property in Houston (with the exception of government-owned property and churches).
Subsequently a lawsuit was filed and in 2015, the charter amendment was deemed null and void by the Texas Supreme Court citing misleading and deceptive ballot language by the City.  The ballot language did not mention to voters that they would be financially penalized with a substantial fee when/if the measure passed. The Court directed the city to hold a new election with clear ballot language. Since its inception seven years ago, approximately $1.8 billion has been collected through the ReBuild Houston “lock box” program, including an estimated $785 million in drainage fees.  That’s a lot of money collected with no noticeable results.


The City of Houston has raided funds that should have been utilized for street and drainage repair and has spent those dollars on parks, bike trails and over 500 Public Works Department salaries. Additionally, transparency on the utilization of the funds has been nonexistent and the “lockbox” is not, and never has been, locked. Voting no on this measure will send a message to the city’s elected leadership that the people who live and work in Houston deserve honesty, integrity and transparency. Houston did not vote to impose a drainage fee on itself the first time around in 2010, and we shouldn’t vote to continue the fees until such time as the City of Houston provides clear and transparent proof that the funds will be spent on the projects that will ease flooding and provide marked improvement in the conditions of our roadways.

What Will Change?
Mayor Turner says, “If Prop A fails, the city will lose a "dedicated" funding source for flooding, drainage and street improvements.” If the measure fails, the City should repeal the drainage fees imposed on Houstonians and eliminate the “lock box”. They should consider proposing a fully thought-out pay-as-you-go plan that truly improves the current infrastructure and road situation.
If the measure passes, elected officials will continue collecting drainage fees, and once again “promise” to restrict the funds for use on drainage and infrastructure. Unfortunately, we have heard that promise before.

 Proposition B – Firefighters’ Pay Parity - Support


Background
Following pension cuts created within the 2017 legislative session “pension reform” legislation, and a break down in collective bargaining negotiations, Houston Firefighters launched a petition drive to force a vote of the citizens of Houston on pay parity. Firefighters garnered 60,000 Houston voter signatures shortly after which qualified the pay parity issue to be placed on the ballot for voter approval. Proposition B is a vote to grant equal pay for firefighters’ and police officer’s for similar job titles/responsibilities.  While comparing police to fire is as equal to comparing apples and bananas, there is something to be said for paying fair wages to maintain a solid and reliable public safety workforce. 
What Will Change?
A yes vote on Proposition B will force the City of Houston to fairly compensate Houston’s firefighters and to negotiate in good faith. Mayor Turner has been on the campaign trail claiming that Houston cannot afford to fairly compensate our firefighters. His message has been to threaten layoffs which will reduce services and negatively impact public safety.  Mayor Turner has failed to acknowledge that he has added over 2,000 NEW FTE’s to the Houston payroll since taking office in 2016.  Just recently the Mayor and City Council approved a $52 million dollar raise for Houston Police Officers. Under the passage of Proposition H in 2006, $90M in tax dollars were earmarked for police, fire, and emergency medical services each year.  The public has been provided no accounting of where the over $900,000,000.00 tax dollars collected over the period since Proposition H was approved has been spent.  From the looks of it, none of that money has gone to the firefighters. We believe efficiencies could certainly be identified to cut spending and maintain our firefighter workforce and public safety.

Houston’s firefighters deserve to be treated with fairness and equity by elected leaders.

#tb


No comments:

Post a Comment