The below excerpt from City of Houston Council Member Mike Knox's August newsletter, explains well the current situation between the Mayor and the Houston Professional Fire Fighters Association.
Elected Officials:
Rulers or Representatives?
Once again, the Houston
Council is being confronted with another ethical issue.
During July of 2017, the
Houston Professional Fire Fighters Association, Local 341, submitted a petition
to amend the Charter of the City of Houston to require the city to pay Fire
Fighters of comparable rank equal to the officers of the Houston Police
Department.
The Fire Fighters
followed the requirements of the city ordinance and collected the required
signatures and turned them in to the City Secretary to be verified. The
City Secretary failed to verify the signatures in a timely manner. The
opportunity was lost to place the petition before the voters on the November
2017 ballot. Following a court order, the city secretary verified the
required signatures.
The Mayor has
subsequently delayed placing the petition on the agenda for consideration by
Council Members until August 8, 2018. The Mayor reasoned that he did not
understand what parity means, how it is defined, or how much it would
cost. Following weeks and months of questions by Council, and the attempt
by some Council Members to force the item onto the agenda, the Mayor directed
the Budget and Fiscal Affairs Committee (BFA Committee) to conduct a
meeting. The purpose of this meeting was not to discuss placing the item
onto the agenda but rather to inform Council Members about the merits and
potential costs of the proposed City Charter Amendment.
Two things to note about
the timing of this meeting. First, Council Members were informed by a memo
from the city legal department that Council Members have a “ministerial duty”
to place the item onto a ballot because the requirements to do so had been
met. However, there is no requirement to place the item on the next
available ballot. The suggestion was we, as Council Members, could vote to
place the item on some future ballot beyond the upcoming November 2018 ballot. Second,
The BFA meeting called was to focus on the costs to the city and the impact of
those costs on the city budget. Therefore, the meeting provided Council
Members the opportunity to legitimately postpone placing this item on the November
2018 ballot. Clearly, the unstated basis for the delay in placing the item
on the November 2018 ballot is that it will adversely affect the current budget
approved by council in May of 2018. The Mayor and several City Council
Members do not agree with the content of the Fire Fighters’
petition. Therein lies the ethical issue.
Regardless of your
stance on the issue, each Council Member and the Mayor must decide if it is
their duty to rule over the citizens of Houston by denying this petition a
place on the November 2018 ballot or, should they honor the process and
represent their constituents by placing the item on the November 2018 ballot
for the voters to decide.
Should the Charter
Amendment pass, there is no doubt significant changes will have to be made to the
existing budget. By postponing or delaying the placement of the item on
the ballot your city leaders are indicating they think they know better how to
spend your money than you do. More importantly, the City Government is
suggesting they can ignore the process and decide, based on whether or not they
agree with the proposed amendment, to place it on the first available ballot or
to delay the item to some future ballot.
The upcoming August vote
by council to place the item on the November 2018 ballot will be very telling.
The citizens of Houston will be able to clearly see which of their elected
officials view themselves as rulers and which ones recognize their
responsibility to represent the will of the people.
Thank you Council Member Knox for the excellent explanation and for always asking the right questions. #tb
No comments:
Post a Comment